Speed up code review

Automated code review for the checks you repeat every day

Let an assistant flag common mistakes, forgotten tests and surprising changes so people can focus on user impact and difficult decisions.

Automated review adds another set of eyes

A review assistant reads changed files, reports familiar problems and checks whether tests or documentation were affected. It is most useful for rules that recur across many changes. It cannot try the feature like a user, but it can reveal obvious omissions earlier.

Where automated review helps

Where automated review helps.

Risky input handling

Flag new input paths without validation or a useful error message.

Forgotten companion work

Notice behavior changes that have no matching test or documentation update.

Unexpected scope

Highlight files with no clear connection to the stated task.

Add the assistant to your existing review

Begin with a few common problems and improve the rules from real results.

  1. Choose a repeated task

    List the five mistake types most often missed in your project.

  2. Give it a goal and project

    Provide the task, the proposed change and short project rules.

  3. Let the agent do the work

    Require each note to name the file, location and plain reason.

  4. Try the visible result

    Keep useful checks and remove rules that repeatedly create noise.

What still needs human judgment

Correct product behavior cannot be decided from code lines alone.

  • Does it solve the right user problem?
  • Are the interface and wording understandable?
  • Are effects on real data and existing routines acceptable?
  • Is the maintenance cost reasonable for the benefit?
Official documentation and further reading

Technical references are linked to the original project or manufacturer documentation.